{"value":{"id":482178,"memberId":1413,"member":null,"memberRole":"The Leader of the House","uin":"HCWS634","dateMade":"2016-03-21T00:00:00","answeringBodyId":53,"answeringBodyName":"Cabinet Office","title":"Short Money Reform","text":"<p>I wish to update the House on the Government’s proposed reforms to Short money.</p><p> </p><p>The Autumn Statement in November outlined proposals to reform Short money and last month, the Cabinet Office published a request for views, which was followed by further constructive discussions with political parties.</p><p> </p><p>These discussions have now concluded and the Government is bringing forward a package of proposals to reform Short money and Representative money, recognising the importance of an effective opposition to hold the government to account. The changes will deliver an estimated cumulative £3.6 million saving to taxpayer-funded Short money over this Parliament and increase transparency and accountability over how taxpayers’ money is spent.</p><p> </p><p>A motion delivering these reforms will be tabled later today for consideration by the House on Wednesday 23 March. In summary, the motion will propose the following changes:</p><p> </p><ol><li>The annual indexation would be linked to CPI rather than RPI.</li><li>The CPI change would mean that Short money figures for the 2016-17 financial year would be based on the uprating of the 2015-16 figures by reference to CPI, rather than RPI.</li><li>Transparency requirements would be introduced to safeguard the spending of taxpayers’ money. It would provide for a regime of publishing audited accounts, with a breakdown of Short money spending, including transparency over senior staff salaries.</li><li>The Members Estimates Committee would determine the detail of the auditing and transparency regime; the reporting should commence for the 2016-17 financial year.</li><li>The transparency regime would reflect the need for enhanced scrutiny of HM Opposition.</li><li>The Members Estimates Committee would be tasked to consider the effect of planned reduction in the size of the House of Commons on the Short money formula from 2020-21 onwards, recognising the goal of reducing the cost of politics; it would report by end of the 2016-2017 session.</li><li>A minimum funding floor would be introduced for the smallest parties (parties up to and including 5 MPs). This would be 50% of the IPSA staff allowance for one non-London area MP.</li><li>A maximum funding ceiling would be introduced for the smallest parties (parties up to and including 5 MPs). This would be 150% of the IPSA staff allowance for one non-London area MP.</li><li>The resolution would come into effect from the start of 2016-17 financial year.</li><li>The Representative money scheme would be amended to mirror the changes to Short money.</li></ol><p> </p><p>In addition, Policy Development Grants will remain frozen, so they will fall in real terms in each year over this Parliament.</p><p> </p><p>These balanced and reasonable proposals will deliver a significant saving of taxpayers’ money, reducing expenditure by 10.6% compared to forecast levels, and will further extend the Government’s ongoing transparency agenda.</p><p> </p><p> </p>","house":"Commons","noticeNumber":2,"hasAttachments":false,"hasLinkedStatements":false,"linkedStatements":null,"attachments":[]},"links":[{"rel":"self","href":"/Statements/482178","method":"GET"}]}